Trump promises to 'strongly regulate' social media platforms after Twitter added fact-check links
- Trump press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said the President plans to issue an executive order "pertaining to social media," several White House reporters aboard Air Force One tweeted on Wednesday.
- McEnany gave no details about what Trump's order would do, but said it will be signed on Thursday, according to PBS Newshour White House correspondent Yamiche Alcindor.
- The Washington Post reported that the order may encourage federal agencies to investigate tech companies' moderation policies and narrow Section 230, which shields them from legal liability for content published on their platforms.
- Law professor Kate Klonick tweeted that she had obtained a draft of the order, saying it would argue that fact-checking is "editorial" speech and thus isn't protected under Section 230.
- The proposed order comes after Twitter added a fact-checking label Tuesday to the president's tweets falsely claiming mail-in voting is linked to fraud.
- Trump responded by ranting against Twitter, on Twitter, accusing the company of "interfering in the 2020 Presidential Election" and silencing conservative voices.
- Legal experts have expressed doubt that Trump has the legal authority to regulate social media companies in the way he has threatened, citing free speech protections.
- For more articles, go to www.BusinessInsider.co.za.
President Donald Trump is planning to issue an executive order on Thursday "pertaining to social media," according to several White House reporters who were briefed by White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany aboard Air Force One on Wednesday evening.
McEnany offered no details about what the directive may include, but The Washington Post reported that it could empower various federal agencies to penalise social media companies such as Twitter, Facebook, and Google for their content moderation practices.
Two officials familiar with the order told the paper it would task the US Commerce Department with asking the Federal Communications Commission to look at narrowing the scope of Section 230, a provision of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 that shields internet companies from legal liability for content published on their sites and gives them broad power to moderate that content.
The sources also told The Washington Post that the order could funnel complaints about political bias to the Federal Trade Commission, which could then investigate social media companies' content moderation practices, as well as require federal agencies to conduct a review of their social media advertising spending.
Kate Klonick, a law professor at St. John's University and fellow at Yale University' Information Society Project, tweeted late Wednesday that she had obtained a draft of the order. She said the order may argue that fact-checking falls under "editorial conduct" and therefore isn't protected under Section 230.
Klonick also said the order could also prohibit federal agencies from advertising on platforms that violate the editorial conduct provision of Section 230.
Trump's proposed order came after Twitter's decision earlier this week to add a fact-checking label to Trump's tweets that falsely claimed vote-by-mail ballots are linked to fraud.
Twitter added a link below the tweets with the text: "Get the facts about mail-in ballots" which took users to a page where fact-checkers had debunked the unsubstantiated claims.
There is NO WAY (ZERO!) that Mail-In Ballots will be anything less than substantially fraudulent. Mail boxes will be robbed, ballots will be forged & even illegally printed out & fraudulently signed. The Governor of California is sending Ballots to millions of people, anyone.....— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 26, 2020
Trump ranted against Twitter's decision in a series of tweets, accusing the company of "interfering in the 2020 Presidential Election" and "completely stifling FREE SPEECH."
Following reports of Trump's planned executive order, Twitter responded by saying Trump had violated its policy against "manipulating or interfering in elections or other civic processes," which "includes posting or sharing content that may suppress participation or mislead people about when, where, or how to participate in a civic process."
"We added a label to two @realDonaldTrump Tweets about California's vote-by-mail plans as part of our efforts to enforce our civic integrity policy. We believe those Tweets could confuse voters about what they need to do to receive a ballot and participate in the election process," the company said in a tweet Wednesday evening.
We added a label to two @realDonaldTrump Tweets about Californiaâ€™s vote-by-mail plans as part of our efforts to enforce our civic integrity policy. We believe those Tweets could confuse voters about what they need to do to receive a ballot and participate in the election process.— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) May 28, 2020
It's not the first time the Trump administration has threatened legal action against social media companies who make decisions the president disagrees with.
Last year, the White House drafted a proposal aimed at penalising platforms for alleged bias against conservatives - a claim that conservatives have frequently raised but have yet to provide evidence to support. Earlier on Wednesday, a federal judge tossed a lawsuit that claimed Twitter, Facebook, Apple, and Google conspired to suppress conservative views online, Bloomberg reported.
It's also likely that Trump doesn't have the legal grounds to issue such regulations, according to multiple experts who told Business Insider that the First Amendment, Section 230, and other legal protections give private companies broad rights around regulating content on their platforms.
However, Trump's order could drag social media companies into a fight over Section 230 that they've been desperately trying to avoid. The legal shield it provides, which was instrumental in the development of the modern internet, has become a hotly debated issue in recent years from both sides of the aisle.
Receive a daily update on your cellphone with all our latest news: click here.
Get the best of our site emailed to you daily: click here.
- ANALYSIS: Govt has cited the science behind SA’s cigarette ban – but it doesn’t add up
- Even workers who are not registered with the UIF can now get Covid-19 payouts
- Diesel is in short supply around SA – and these areas could be worst affected
- Restaurants demand govt explains why they must remain shut - as mosques, churches can open doors
- Freak cable break halts new round of applications for UIF Covid-19 cash