A US Senator is pushing a bill to stop 'Fortnite' and other games from selling 'loot boxes' to kids —Here's why loot boxes are causing so much panic
- Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri plans to introduce a new bill banning microtransactions in games marketed towards kids.
- Titled "The Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act," the bill would prevent the sale of "loot boxes," that contain a random collection of items, and "pay to win"
- Hawley, who has also criticized social media platforms, says the micro-transactions are designed to profit from addiction and compulsive behavior.
- For more, go to Business Insider SA.
Government officials want to crack down on an increasingly common feature of video games: Loot boxes.
Missouri Senator Josh Hawley plans to introduce a new bill that would ban the use of loot boxes and other types of micro-transactions in video games that are marketed toward children. The Washington Post reports that Hawley's bill will be called "The Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act," and would affect games designed for children, as well as mature games with players under the age of 18 like "Mortal Kombat" or "Call of Duty."
Micro-transactions have become a major part of the video game industry, and provide the entire business model of many popular games. For example, "Fortnite" is available for free but was able to generate more than $2 billion (R28 billion) from micro-transactions last year. Other popular games that include some version of micro-transactions include "FIFA 19," "Apex Legends," "Overwatch," "PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds," and "NBA 2K19."
But what exactly is the difference between a loot box and a micotransaction? Here's a look of the controversial new game payment features raising the ire of lawmakers, and a breakdown of everything you need to know about loot boxes:
So what exactly is a loot box?
"Loot boxes" are virtual packages containing digital items for use in a specific video game; most games sell loot boxes for real cash via micro-transactions, but some allow players to earn them by playing too.
The thing that makes loot boxes especially controversial is that players usually don't know what's inside the box (box contents are randomized, with the odds of encountering each item set in advance by the developer). That has led critics to liken the boxes to a form of gambling.
In some cases, the items inside a loot box can also make the game easier, creating an added incentive to spend real money to acquire a digital item faster. Providing power-ups through microtransactions is often derided as a "pay-to-win" business model.
Sen. Hawley said that loot boxes systems are addicting for children, and game developers should face legal consequences for their actions.
"Video game companies are using "pay-to-win" and "loot box" systems to addict children to their games and spend their parents money," Sen. Hawley wrote on Twitter. "The industry needs to be upfront about their role in America's growing addiction economy & stop practices that exploit kids."
In statements given to Kotaku and the Washington Post, Hawley specifically identified "Candy Crush," a popular mobile game that sells items to make the game easier. While the base game is free, the micro-transactions allow players to spend as much as $150 on a single purchase.
Loot boxes are expected to generate $50 billion in revenue for app makers by 2022.
Juniper Research reports that loot boxes and related gambling could generate as much as $50 billion in spending by 2022. Critics of the loot box business model compare micro-transactions to gambling, because the odds of obtaining specific items are often unknown to the buyer, and the desire to find the rarest items can lead some players to continue spending money on a game with little return on investment. As more video games adopt loot boxes and micro-transactions as a standard, lawmakers around the world have expressed concerns that children are being exposed to an entry-level form of gambling.
Especially rare loot box items often come with long odds. Legendary items in "Overwatch" show up in just 7.5% of loot boxes- there are more than 100 legendary items to collect with no way to control which ones you get first. Collecting them all means buying more than 1,200 loot boxes for $2 each, or playing for hundreds of hours to unlock them over time. While the game costs $40 to play, players have speculated that you'd need to spend between $1,000 and $3,000 to unlock every item.
The Federal Trade Commission is already planning a workshop to discuss loot boxes and micro-transactions.
Prior to Hawley's bill, Sen. Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire asked the Federal Trade Commission to investigate loot box practices to ensure that children are protected and that parents are informed about potential negatives. FTC Chairman Joseph Simons responded by planning a public workshop with consumer advocacy groups, members of the video game industry, and parent organizations. Titled Inside the Game, the workshop will be held on August 7th at the FTC Constitution Center in Washington D.C. The public can leave comments and suggest potential discussion topics by emailing firstname.lastname@example.org.
The Entertainment Software Association says that parents already have the tools they need to prevent addiction and excessive spending.
Sen. Hassan also wrote an open letter to the Entertainment Software Ratings Board (ESRB) in early 2018 asking the board to collect data on the use and revenue generated by micro-transactions in video games. The ESRB is responsible for providing an age rating for new games based on their content. As of February 2018, games rated by the ESRB carry an "in-game purchases" label when micro-transactions are present.
The Entertainment Software Association, which operates the ESRB and represents the political interests of American video game companies, says parents already have tools to control their child's online spending. ESA CEO and Acting President Stanley Pierre-Louis issued the following statement in response to Sen. Hawley's comments:
"Numerous countries, including Ireland, Germany, Sweden, Denmark, Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom, determined that loot boxes do not constitute gambling. We look forward to sharing with the senator the tools and information the industry already provides that keeps the control of in-game spending in parents' hands. Parents already have the ability to limit or prohibit in-game purchases with easy to use parental controls."
To learn more about the tools ESRB provides for parents to monitor their children's games, visit parentaltools.org.
A few countries have already moved to ban loot boxes on the basis of gambling, but most are still waiting to make a judgement.
While multiple countries have determined that loot boxes do not constitute gambling, a few have pushed back against the practice. Belgium and the Netherlands found that loot boxes violate their gaming laws and banned the practice, which led several video games to pull their games in those countries. China just announced new regulations that limit loot box practices and gambling-based games in general.
In September 2018, the Gambling Regulators European Forum released a joint statement signed by officials from 15 European countries and the Washington State Gambling Commission expressing concerns about the potential connection between loot boxes and gambling.
It'll be a while before the U.S. government is ready to take regulatory action against loot boxes or other micro-transactions, but it will be interesting to see how the conversation develops when as Hassley's bill is introduced and the FTC hosts its workshop later this summer.
Receive a single WhatsApp every morning with all our latest news: click here.
Also from Business Insider South Africa:
- Scientists are trying to 'bribe' South African penguins with sexy decoys and enticing bird calls
- A man was bitten in the face by a snake, and the horrifying moment was captured on a doorbell cam
- Adidas has launched a collection of sneakers inspired by Marvel superheroes
- A woman was reportedly thrown off a flight in New Zealand after she 'put her fingers in her ears' and refused to watch air safety instructions