The biggest game in the world can't allow Xbox and PlayStation players to play together — and it highlights a critical problem with gaming
"Super Mario" is an anomaly compared to most modern video games.
Not the character himself — video games are rife with cartoonish characters — but the franchise. Nintendo is a rare exception in the modern era, since it keeps its blockbuster franchises locked to its platforms. Other than that, most video games come out on most video game platforms.
Games like the wildly successful "Fortnite" are so wildly successful in part because of their accessibility. If you have an Xbox One, a PlayStation 4, or a computer, you can play "Fortnite." And that means hundreds of millions of people are potential players.
That's a crucial part of why over 45 million people played it in the last six months.
Just last month, the game's concurrent player count peaked at 3.4 million people — that's over 3 million people playing the game at the same time. It's kind of a big deal!
And now, "Fortnite" is coming to Android and iPhone. Better yet: Players on Android and iPhone can play with PlayStation 4 and computer players. Similarly, players on Android and iPhone can play with Xbox One and computer players.
You may've already noticed as much, but there's a subtle distinction there: PlayStation 4 and Xbox One players can't play together. Here's the breakdown straight from Epic Games PR representative Nick Chester:
That's right — every other platform can play nice together (including Apple), but Sony and Microsoft can't get past their competitive differences to allow players on the PlayStation 4 and Xbox One to play together.
It's not because the games are different on the two consoles, and it's not because the games control differently on the two consoles. The reason is far more banal, and it's representative of a problem at the heart of modern console gaming.
Another huge game, "Overwatch," suffers from the same problem.
"It's a mix of technical and business reasons," game director Jeff Kaplan told me in an interview last year at a New York City event for the one-year anniversary of "Overwatch."
"Right now, the two platforms — in particular, Xbox to PlayStation — is not an open ecosystem. They're very closed-off ecosystems, and it's very hard to cross those boundaries."
This is a long-running issue with video games, for as long as online gaming has existed on game consoles.
Every year, a new "Call of Duty" game comes out. Every year, millions of people buy that game — many of those people buying it solely to play the game online. And those people are siloed off into console-specific online multiplayer. Your Aunt bought "Battlefield" on Xbox, but you got it on PlayStation? Too bad, friend! It's the same game, yet you can't play together. It's not technically impossible, of course, though there are some service issues getting in the way.
Chat, for instance.
If you're playing a cross-platform game on Xbox One, you couldn't chat with players on PlayStation 4, nor could you team up with players on PlayStation 4. It's an imperfect compromise that "Overwatch" developer Blizzard Entertainment doesn't want to allow with its team-based online shooter. "If we were to suddenly say, 'Oh yeah, you can play cross-platform. But you can't group up with or talk to any of your friends.' I think more of our players would be like, 'This is broken, it doesn't feel right.'"
So, what gives? Why won't Sony and Microsoft work together to make cross-platform multiplayer a reality? The reason, largely boils down to one word: Business.
Microsoft and Sony are competitors (at least when it comes to Xbox and PlayStation), and they want you to keep using their platform. Enabling cross-platform play — online gameplay between Xbox and PlayStation players — further blurs the line between the already very similar consoles. And neither company wants you to think of their console as interchangeable with the competition.
Of course, that doesn't matter if you're the average person who wants to play a game with your friend. I certainly understand the business reasons behind this, but as a consumer I still think it's junk. And if you're the man in charge of a massively popular game like "Overwatch," it's pretty frustrating as well.
"We're very respectful, and we understand our partners and why they're not allowing it at this time," Kaplan said. But? "We'll use whatever influence we have to keep reminding them, 'Hey, this would be cool. It's something our players really want. It's something your players really want.' That seems like a win to us.
Receive a single WhatsApp message every morning with all our latest news. Sign up here.
- The Galaxy S9 versus the Galaxy S8 — it isn't worth the upgrade unless you zoom a lot
- Black Panther just made box office history. Not bad for a movie shot in the Free State
- Rolls-Royce revealed new bespoke designs for its iconic limo and convertible — and they look incredible
- Woolworths confirms its beloved salami sticks were made in the Listeriosis-implicated factory
- Nescafé, Ricoffy and Frisco are at war – which means cheaper prices for instant coffee drinkers
- The for-profit side of Blue Bulls rugby is sucking its amateur club dry
- Nhlanhla Nene personally stepped in to stop the ANC from debating Reserve Bank nationalisation in Parliament – to the party's considerable embarrassment
- This is what your smartphone is doing to your brain – and it isn't good
- Sun International fought tooth and nail to build a 'sure thing' mega-casino in Menlyn, Pretoria. Now it is losing money on the deal.
- South Africans will be able to shout at Steinhoff directors from Cape Town in April – but won’t be able to directly vote at its AGM
- Horse meat imports into SA have suddenly jumped – and we don’t know where most of it went
- Caltex will soon disappear as Sinopec comes to town
- 7 of SA's most exclusive country clubs, where membership can cost up to R1 million
- Step by step: This is how SA scientists cracked the secret 'language' of listeria
- Christo Wiese drops off Forbes rich-list amid Steinhoff scandal – after losing R50 billion of his fortuneR260 million was spent to turn Cape Town into an ancient city for BBC's most expensive TV series ever
- How to find a job on Google, now in South Africa