Men represent the majority of coronavirus cases so far, according to a new study
- Early research suggested that the deadly coronavirus that originated in Wuhan, China, has infected more men than women.
- A recent study from nearly 140 coronavirus patients showed the virus was most likely to affect older men with preexisting illnesses.
- Some researchers suspect that men have certain biological conditions that make them more likely to contract the virus, but others have suggested that women are just as susceptible.
- For more stories go to www.BusinessInsider.co.za.
The deadly coronavirus that originated in Wuhan, China, has infected more men than women, and scientists are divided about why that is.
The virus has killed more than 910 people and infected more than 40,000, with the vast majority of cases in mainland China. (For the latest case total and death toll, see Business Insider's live updates here.) A recent study of nearly 140 coronavirus patients at a Wuhan University hospital offers one of the broadest pictures of how the virus operates in humans so far.
The researchers found that the virus was most likely to affect older men with preexisting health problems. More than 54% of the patients in the study were men, and the median age of patients was 56.
Other recent studies have produced similar results. A study of 99 coronavirus patients at Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital showed that the average patient was 55 1/2 years old, and men represented around 68% of the total cases. A third study of nearly 1,100 coronavirus patients (which is still awaiting peer review) identified a median age of 47, with men representing around 58% of all cases.
This data has led some researchers to suspect that men have certain biological conditions that make them more susceptible to the virus. But other researchers aren't so sure.
SARS affected mostly men too
In the absence of much reliable broad data about the new coronavirus, scientists have turned to a similar outbreak - the SARS pandemic from 2002 to 2003 - for clues.
SARS was also a coronavirus that jumped from animals to people in wet markets. It shares about 80% of its genome with the novel coronavirus, and like the current outbreak, it infected more men than women.
In 2017, researchers at the University of Iowa set out to investigate why that was by infecting male and female mice with SARS. Mice studies don't necessarily have definitive implications for humans, but the researchers did find that male mice were more susceptible to the virus than female mice.
The team attributed those results to genes on the X chromosome and hormones such as estrogen that may keep a virus from spreading throughout the female body.
The researchers at Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital gave a similar explanation for why more of their coronavirus patients were men, suggesting that women may have a "reduced susceptibility" to viral infections. But they also said many patients with severe cases had chronic illnesses such as cardiovascular disease or diabetes. Those particular illnesses tend to affect middle-age men more than middle-age women.
The outbreak started among mostly male workers
Aaron Milstone, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins University, told Business Insider that he didn't think one subset of the population was necessarily more vulnerable than another.
"When we see any new virus, the whole population is susceptible," he said.
The new study from Wuhan University also showed that the share of male and female coronavirus patients in the Intensive Care Unit was about the same as the share of male and female coronavirus patients in other parts of the hospital. That suggests the men's symptoms weren't more severe than women's overall (though some patients are still hospitalised, so their conditions could change over time).
The researchers attributed the higher number of male patients to the outbreak's origin at the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan, which has mostly male workers.
But Milstone said any dataset from this coronavirus outbreak was still inherently limited at this point.
"There can be underreporting because of undertesting, especially because this is not a commercially available test," Milstone said. "We don't know enough yet about what's happening."
Receive a daily update on your cellphone with all our latest news: click here.
Also from Business Insider South Africa:
- Govt pension fund's R586m Klerksdorp deal: From Australia, developer blames outrage on competitors
- South Africans may have lost millions to a Canadian-American ‘world top leading financial company’ that never existed
- Everything we know about the pangolin — the scaly mammal that may have spread the coronavirus to humans
- The price at the till not the price advertised? You can score at PnP and Woolworths for spotting mistakes
- A terrifying video shows BA plane aborting its landing during UK's 'storm of the century'
- Thousands of Chinese doctors volunteered for the frontline of the coronavirus outbreak