A medical algorithm affecting 200 million patients has steered black patients away from getting higher-quality care, showing just how biased artificial intelligence can be
- A new study in the journal Science just found a widely-used algorithm gave more complex treatment to white patients than sicker black patients.
- The study's findings point to one of the many risks to implementing more AI in healthcare. Business Insider Intelligence predicts that spending on healthcare AI is projected to grow at an annualised 48% between 2017 and 2023.
- Algorithms also strip doctors and nurses from the autonomy to diagnose and treat patients individually.
- For more stories go to www.BusinessInsider.co.za.
Technology could likely be making healthcare more racially biased, a new study finds.
One algorithm that identifies which patients would benefit from complex health procedures favoured treating white patients than sicker black ones between 2013 and 2015.
The algorithm predicted black patients would cost less, which signalled to medical providers that their illnesses must not be that bad. But, in reality, black patients cost less because they don't purchase healthcare services as much as white people on average.
The study, published in the prestigious journal Science, stated black patients don't seek out healthcare due to a lack of access and a general mistrust in the system. Facing more barriers to accessing healthcare, in turn, indirectly drives down the projected "cost" of illness in black patients.
Health systems use this algorithm on 200 million people each year, the report states. If the algorithm were to eliminate the racial bias, black patients who receive additional help would increase from 17.7% to 46.5%, the report states.
The trouble with algorithmic healthcare
AI and algorithms are on the rise in the health industry. Business Insider Intelligence predicts that spending on healthcare AI is projected to grow at an annualised 48% between 2017 and 2023.
Yet experts and researchers have long called out the bias algorithms can perpetuate. Amazon built a hiring tool that discriminated against women. Tweets from black people were more likely to be dubbed "toxic" in a Google-funded AI tool. Facial recognition tools used by the US government have been shown to misidentify black people much more often than white people.
Another reason is that algorithms use data that historically perpetuated racial inequality, like zip codes. In the 1930s, the US explicitly segregated African-American neighborhoods from white ones through policies known as "redlining." Today, these policies have lasting impact on racial makeup on zip codes - which means using these zip codes in algorithms perpetuates racial inequality.
Gerard Brogan, a registered nurse and the director of nursing practice National Nurses United and their California branch, says algorithm takes autonomy from clinicians. While algorithms take the average of patient outcomes to find treatment, most nurses and doctors prefer to provide treatment tailored to each individual.
"Traditionally, both nurses and doctors are independent professionals, but because it's now an industry, we're looking at care where algorithms are dictating care rather than professional judgment," Brogan said. "Bill Gates a few years ago said in 15 years time there will be nurses, there will be no doctors, because no one can out-think a computer," Brogan said. "Algorithms may beat people at chess, but they don't hold peoples' hands."
Also from Business Insider South Africa:
- Take a look: Durban’s new R380 million beachfront promenade upgrade is nearly done
- The R100,000-a-year St Stithians College in Johannesburg now has its own Seattle coffee shop
- People all over the world are searching for video of former Bishops teacher Fiona Viotti – mostly without success
- Clicks says employees pocketed an average of R355,000 each from its employee share scheme. Here’s how it worked.
- MTN is giving away 1GB of free data – with a catch, and cake
- Embattled SABC plans to launch a streaming service to take on Netflix